Buyer prompt · published evidence

What sales intelligence tool should a startup evaluate for useful coverage, fast setup, transparent cost, sequencing, and low administration?

An exact prompt-level view of which reviewed brands surfaced and which public URLs the configured AI models cited. No answer text or tenant data is published.

Intent
recommendation
Model providers
3
Categories
1
Last observed
Aug 18, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC
Competitive outcome

Brands surfaced

Ordered by provider breadth, then total mentions and owned-domain citations. A mention is not an endorsement or a position claim.

#BrandCategoryProvidersMentionsOwned citationsProvider evidence
01ZoomInfozoominfo.comSales data242Openai · Gemini
02Apollo.ioapollo.ioSales data230Openai · Gemini
03Cognismcognism.comSales data120Openai
04Clayclay.comSales data110Gemini
05LinkedIn Sales Navigatorlinkedin.comSales data110Openai
Model comparison

Answer matrix

One row per configured provider and category snapshot. Hashes prove answer identity without publishing stored answer text.

ProviderModel versionCategoryBrands surfacedCitationsUnique domainsAnswer hash
Openaiopenai/gpt-4o-miniSales dataZoomInfo · Apollo.io · LinkedIn Sales Navigator · Cognism996ab01a56…e5d0e
Anthropicanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5Sales dataNone observed0059044015…c5c2e
Geminigoogle/gemini-2.5-flashSales dataZoomInfo · Apollo.io · Clay774bb3076e…b8233
URL-derived citations

Sources cited

Hostnames are derived from the returned public URLs. Best position is the smallest citation position observed.

Snapshot IDs2ce87b27-850a-47a0-96a1-dded6e265347
Corpus versionssales-intelligence-platforms-2026-07-27
Benchmark versions4-sales-intelligence-platforms-2026-07-27-models-64232fd32583

Coverage: Sales data. Full answers stored: no · Full answers published: no · Tenant data included: no.