rank.ai for agencies

Partially. We market the agency-platform pitch today on /white-label-solutions, and the underlying multi-tenant architecture is in place, but the full brand-customization engine — your logo across the dashboard, custom domain on the client portal, fully branded PDF/dashboard exports — is in roadmap, not shipped. If you need to put your agency's brand in front of clients this month, the more complete answer today is to use rank.ai internally and export the data into your existing reporting tool. We're being upfront about this so you don't sign a contract expecting a feature we haven't built.

Yes for the data, partially for the access model. The Org model supports multiple websites per Org today, so you can track geo-grid rankings, AI visibility, and content generation across your full client roster from one login. What's in roadmap is the agency-hierarchy access model — separate billing per client, per-client team-member access, true client-portal logins. If you need a single agency login that covers all your clients today, you're in the right place. If you need each client to log in directly with their own restricted view, that's coming.

Different model. LocalFalcon prices each map-pin scan in credits (a 5x5 grid is 25 credits) and BrightLocal layers per-client per-month report fees. Our subscription is flat-rate across geo-grid scans, AI visibility checks, and article generation — no per-scan or per-client metering. For agencies managing 10-100 clients, the math usually lands in your favor because the marginal cost of adding the 50th client doesn't tick a counter. We don't quote dollar amounts on this page because tier cutoffs change; see /pricing for current numbers.

You can run all rank-tracking, AI-visibility, and content data per-website today, which means you can pull and present data per-client. What's in roadmap is the branded auto-export — PDF reports with your logo, scheduled email delivery to the client, white-label client-portal logins. For now, most agencies copy the relevant dashboards and present them in their own client-meeting cadence.

Today the migration is a re-setup: you re-enter each location, target keywords, and grid configuration in rank.ai. We don't yet pull historical scan history out of LocalFalcon's API. The pattern that works for most teams switching for the AI rank + content side is to keep LocalFalcon running for one billing cycle while rank.ai's history builds, so client reports stay continuous — then make the call after a month of side-by-side data.

Up to you. The article generator is built so a marketer can drive it directly — pick the keyword, brief settings, target CMS — without writing prose. If you have an in-house content team, the pattern most agencies use is to have the generator produce the first draft and the editor takes it from there; the multi-CMS publish step (Webflow, WordPress, Shopify, WordPress.com) means the editor can finalize and ship without a separate handoff to a developer. If you've been paying $400/post to freelancers for SEO content, the math gets interesting fast.

We offer a free tier on most surfaces (a small monthly article allowance, a limited number of tracked keywords) so you can drive the product before committing. Agencies usually want a demo first because the multi-client setup is a 10-minute conversation rather than a self-serve flow — book one on /contact-us and we'll walk through your stack and show you where rank.ai fits.

Direct client logins with a scoped per-client view are in roadmap (Wave 3 agency hierarchy). Today the cleanest pattern is to add the client as a teammate on their specific website inside your Org — they see their data without seeing the rest of your client roster, but the dashboard isn't yet branded as your agency. If a fully branded, fully isolated client portal is a hard requirement this quarter, we'd rather you know upfront than be disappointed.