RANK.AI DATA / Latest

Legal AI Platform Rank

Daily visibility of legal research, drafting, contract, litigation, and knowledge products across a neutral buying corpus.

Cohort coverage: 12 / 12 · 100%
Evidence: 168 observations
Freshness: current
Export: CSV / JSON

Saved views & sharingPresets, bookmark link, share card, and change feedOpen tools

PUBLIC VIEW / NO LOGINTrack this exact boardFilters and comparisons stay in the URL. Bookmark it, share it, or follow verified snapshot changes.

Follow changes

Watching publication Jul 27, 2026

Leaderboard

Current rankings

Metric: Recommendation-prompt presence

Find in tableEntity typeMovementConfidenceEvidence NRank rangeColumnsSort rowsAnswer providerBrand signal

12of 12 rows

Legal AI Platform Rank current rankings
Rank	Entity	Recommendation-prompt presence	Mention coverage	Mention share	Citation share	Engine breadth	OpenAI rec. presence	OpenAI coverage	Confidence	N	Change	Trend	Explain
01	Harveycompany	41.7%	47.92% · 23 / 48	22.55% · 23 / 102	17.65% · 9 / 51	3	50% · 4 / 8	43.75% · 7 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
02	CoCounselcompany	37.5%	33.33% · 16 / 48	15.69% · 16 / 102	13.73% · 7 / 51	3	50% · 4 / 8	31.25% · 5 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
03	Spellbookcompany	37.5%	33.33% · 16 / 48	15.69% · 16 / 102	0% · 0 / 51	3	50% · 4 / 8	43.75% · 7 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
04	Clio Duocompany	29.2%	33.33% · 16 / 48	15.69% · 16 / 102	35.29% · 18 / 51	3	25% · 2 / 8	25% · 4 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
05	Lexis+ AIcompany	29.2%	27.08% · 13 / 48	12.75% · 13 / 102	7.84% · 4 / 51	3	37.5% · 3 / 8	18.75% · 3 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
06	Ironclad AIcompany	8.3%	16.67% · 8 / 48	7.84% · 8 / 102	15.69% · 8 / 51	3	25% · 2 / 8	37.5% · 6 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
07	Paxton AIcompany	8.3%	6.25% · 3 / 48	2.94% · 3 / 102	5.88% · 3 / 51	3	12.5% · 1 / 8	6.25% · 1 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
08	Evisortcompany	8.3%	4.17% · 2 / 48	1.96% · 2 / 102	0% · 0 / 51	2	0% · 0 / 8	0% · 0 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
09	Luminancecompany	4.2%	6.25% · 3 / 48	2.94% · 3 / 102	0% · 0 / 51	2	0% · 0 / 8	0% · 0 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
10	vLex Vincent AIcompany	0.0%	4.17% · 2 / 48	1.96% · 2 / 102	3.92% · 2 / 51	2	0% · 0 / 8	6.25% · 1 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
11	Hebbiacompany	0.0%	0% · 0 / 48	0% · 0 / 102	0% · 0 / 51	0	0% · 0 / 8	0% · 0 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
12	Legoracompany	0.0%	0% · 0 / 48	0% · 0 / 102	0% · 0 / 51	0	0% · 0 / 8	0% · 0 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank

Legal AI Platform Rank current rankings
Rank	Entity	Recommendation-prompt presence	Mention coverage	Mention share	Citation share	Engine breadth	OpenAI rec. presence	OpenAI coverage	Confidence	N	Change	Trend	Explain
01	Harveycompany	41.7%	47.92% · 23 / 48	22.55% · 23 / 102	17.65% · 9 / 51	3	50% · 4 / 8	43.75% · 7 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
02	CoCounselcompany	37.5%	33.33% · 16 / 48	15.69% · 16 / 102	13.73% · 7 / 51	3	50% · 4 / 8	31.25% · 5 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
03	Spellbookcompany	37.5%	33.33% · 16 / 48	15.69% · 16 / 102	0% · 0 / 51	3	50% · 4 / 8	43.75% · 7 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
04	Clio Duocompany	29.2%	33.33% · 16 / 48	15.69% · 16 / 102	35.29% · 18 / 51	3	25% · 2 / 8	25% · 4 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
05	Lexis+ AIcompany	29.2%	27.08% · 13 / 48	12.75% · 13 / 102	7.84% · 4 / 51	3	37.5% · 3 / 8	18.75% · 3 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
06	Ironclad AIcompany	8.3%	16.67% · 8 / 48	7.84% · 8 / 102	15.69% · 8 / 51	3	25% · 2 / 8	37.5% · 6 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
07	Paxton AIcompany	8.3%	6.25% · 3 / 48	2.94% · 3 / 102	5.88% · 3 / 51	3	12.5% · 1 / 8	6.25% · 1 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
08	Evisortcompany	8.3%	4.17% · 2 / 48	1.96% · 2 / 102	0% · 0 / 51	2	0% · 0 / 8	0% · 0 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
09	Luminancecompany	4.2%	6.25% · 3 / 48	2.94% · 3 / 102	0% · 0 / 51	2	0% · 0 / 8	0% · 0 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
10	vLex Vincent AIcompany	0.0%	4.17% · 2 / 48	1.96% · 2 / 102	3.92% · 2 / 51	2	0% · 0 / 8	6.25% · 1 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
11	Hebbiacompany	0.0%	0% · 0 / 48	0% · 0 / 102	0% · 0 / 51	0	0% · 0 / 8	0% · 0 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
12	Legoracompany	0.0%	0% · 0 / 48	0% · 0 / 102	0% · 0 / 51	0	0% · 0 / 8	0% · 0 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank

Primary brandPrompt intentAnswer enginePrompt contains

Run live test

Answer presence47.9%23/48 filtered answers mention or cite Harvey

Selected-set share42.6%Share of answer-presences among the compared brands, not market share

Owned citation answers99 answer-level URL signals on reviewed owned domains

Engine breadth3/3Engines with at least one observed presence

Filtered competitive answer-presence comparison
Brand	Presence	Vs. primary	Selected share	Mentions	Cited answers	Owned URL signals	Engine breadth
Harveyharvey.ai	47.9%23/48	BASE	42.6%	78	9	9	3/3
CoCounselthomsonreuters.com	33.3%16/48	-14.6 pp	29.6%	51	7	7	3/3
Lexis+ AIlexisnexis.com	27.1%13/48	-20.8 pp	24.1%	22	4	4	3/3
vLex Vincent AIvlex.com	4.2%2/48	-43.8 pp	3.7%	0	2	2	2/3

ANSWER-LEVEL OBSERVATIONS

Prompt × engine matrix

16 prompts · 48 immutable answer hashes · empty cells mean no compared brand was detected.

Brand presence by public prompt and answer engine
Public prompt	OpenAIopenai/gpt-4o-mini	Anthropicanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5	Geminigoogle/gemini-2.5-flash
01 Which legal AI platforms are best for research, drafting, review, analysis, citations, workflow, security, and professional accountability?recommendation	CoCounsel · C1 9 source URLs`d21c962d`	HarveyCoCounsel · C1Lexis+ AI · C1 8 source URLs`0e218b70`	CoCounsel · C1 7 source URLs`1a7f431f`
02 Recommend a legal AI platform for cited case, statute, regulation, secondary-source, and jurisdiction-specific research with verification.recommendation	CoCounsel 6 source URLs`74e7f577`	Lexis+ AI 5 source URLs`148dbeca`	No selected brand 6 source URLs`97a0d768`
03 Which legal AI platforms are strongest for contract review, extraction, playbooks, redlines, risk, comparison, and approval workflows?recommendation	Harvey 5 source URLs`b57eba33`	Harvey 8 source URLs`60d75dcb`	No selected brand 8 source URLs`0fa9be89`
04 Recommend a legal AI platform for drafting and revising agreements, briefs, memos, correspondence, clauses, and transaction documents.recommendation	HarveyLexis+ AI · C1 7 source URLs`0e7e2c49`	CoCounsel 7 source URLs`10d505c4`	Harvey 7 source URLs`34edd9f3`
05 Which legal AI platforms are best for litigation teams handling discovery, chronologies, evidence, depositions, motions, authorities, and case strategy?recommendation	Lexis+ AI 6 source URLs`9b2c425c`	No selected brand 8 source URLs`35ff7f26`	No selected brand 8 source URLs`510b6423`
06 Recommend a legal AI platform for an in-house team managing contracts, requests, policies, knowledge, outside counsel, and business self-service.recommendation	Harvey 7 source URLs`4bde955f`	No selected brand 7 source URLs`f132b3a5`	Harvey · C1Lexis+ AI · C1 8 source URLs`cba78497`
07 Which legal AI platforms are strongest for a law firm that needs matter controls, knowledge integration, auditability, adoption, and support?recommendation	CoCounsel · C1Lexis+ AI 7 source URLs`1241f7c9`	HarveyCoCounselLexis+ AI 9 source URLs`1de42f7d`	Harvey · C1 8 source URLs`ab29c90e`
08 Recommend an affordable legal AI platform for a small practice that needs reliable research, drafting, document review, and clear limits.recommendation	HarveyCoCounsel 6 source URLs`1fe554a5`	No selected brand 5 source URLs`1101b54f`	CoCounsel 7 source URLs`0ca9ddbd`
09 Compare legal AI platforms on accuracy, citations, jurisdictions, workflows, integrations, confidentiality, governance, support, and price.commercial	HarveyCoCounsel 7 source URLs`88b46d2e`	HarveyCoCounsel · C1Lexis+ AI 10 source URLs`79999a43`	HarveyCoCounsel · C1Lexis+ AI 8 source URLs`499c2329`
10 Create a reproducible legal AI evaluation covering authority validity, citation support, jurisdiction, dates, holdings, exceptions, and hallucinations.commercial	No selected brand 0 source URLs`b03208a1`	No selected brand 7 source URLs`1eeb1063`	No selected brand 3 source URLs`a025e0fd`
11 Design a contract-review benchmark for legal AI using known clauses, missing terms, conflicts, defined terms, playbooks, redlines, and explanations.commercial	No selected brand 0 source URLs`74df96be`	No selected brand 6 source URLs`f7ae3fad`	Harvey · C1 2 source URLs`f1e257ff`
12 Compare legal AI platforms on privilege, confidentiality, model training, retention, encryption, permissions, residency, audit logs, and deletion.commercial	vLex Vincent AI · C1 8 source URLs`597dc842`	HarveyCoCounselLexis+ AI 8 source URLs`5e4040fb`	vLex Vincent AI · C1 9 source URLs`8d6b44d1`
13 Compare legal AI platforms on document, matter, contract, research, billing, email, identity, knowledge, API, and workflow integrations.commercial	Harvey 6 source URLs`198b4b78`	Harvey · C1CoCounselLexis+ AI 9 source URLs`3b1f90f7`	Harvey · C1 7 source URLs`a87d8219`
14 How should a buyer compare legal AI pricing across users, matters, documents, research content, modules, implementation, and support?commercial	No selected brand 9 source URLs`3a203a7d`	CoCounsel · C1Lexis+ AI · C1 7 source URLs`e93d2267`	No selected brand 4 source URLs`e963d613`
15 Which criteria expose research, document, playbook, clause, knowledge, matter, workflow, export, and API lock-in in a legal AI platform?commercial	No selected brand 9 source URLs`3768a80d`	Harvey · C1 6 source URLs`0c2f424d`	Harvey · C1 4 source URLs`3e637382`
16 Create a shortlist of legal AI vendors for a regulated organization standardizing governed legal research and document workflows.commercial	Harvey · C1 5 source URLs`2472e29b`	Harvey 8 source URLs`cef85c11`	Harvey · C1CoCounselLexis+ AI 8 source URLs`e68850c3`

STRUCTURED CITATION LEDGER

Sources shaping this filtered view

Hostnames are derived from validated public HTTP(S) URLs, not provider-supplied domain labels.

Validated citation sources in filtered answers
Source hostname	Cited answers	Distinct URLs	Engine breadth	Best position	Evidence
clio.com	15	13	3	#1	Open source ↗
reddit.com	14	12	3	#1	Open source ↗
mycase.com	14	2	3	#1	Open source ↗
darrow.ai	12	1	3	#1	Open source ↗
spellbook.com	10	9	3	#1	Open source ↗
legalfly.com	10	6	3	#1	Open source ↗
harvey.ai	9	6	3	#1	Open source ↗
gc.ai	8	11	3	#1	Open source ↗
linkedin.com	8	8	3	#2	Open source ↗
ironcladapp.com	8	4	3	#1	Open source ↗
legal.thomsonreuters.com	7	4	3	#1	Open source ↗
legalontech.com	7	4	2	#1	Open source ↗
leanlaw.co	7	2	3	#1	Open source ↗
eve.legal	6	2	3	#1	Open source ↗
youtube.com	5	5	2	#3	Open source ↗
legaltechnologyhub.com	4	4	3	#1	Open source ↗
lexisnexis.com	4	4	3	#1	Open source ↗
americanbar.org	4	3	2	#1	Open source ↗
jdsupra.com	4	3	2	#3	Open source ↗
nexlaw.ai	4	3	1	#3	Open source ↗

PUBLIC-BENCHMARK PRIVACY BOUNDARY

This report contains only code-reviewed public prompts, deterministic brand counts, answer hashes, and validated structured citation URLs. Full model answers are neither stored nor published here. No customer, organization, or private tracked-prompt data is included.

legal-ai-platforms-2026-07-27 / 4-legal-ai-platforms-2026-07-27-models-64232fd32583

Legal AI Platform Rank

Current rankings

Brand vs. market

Prompt × engine matrix

Sources shaping this filtered view

Brand vs. market

Prompt × engine matrix

Sources shaping this filtered view