RANK.AI DATA / Latest

AI Writing & Content Citation Share

Ranks reviewed AI Writing & Content brands by their share of answer-level citations to reviewed brand domains.

Cohort coverage: 12 / 12 · 100%
Evidence: 168 observations
Freshness: current
Export: CSV / JSON

Saved views & sharingPresets, bookmark link, share card, and change feedOpen tools

PUBLIC VIEW / NO LOGINFilters and comparisons stay in the URL. Bookmark it, share it, or follow verified snapshot changes.

Follow changes

Watching publication Jul 27, 2026

Leaderboard

Current rankings

Metric: Citation share

Find in tableEntity typeMovementConfidenceEvidence NRank rangeColumnsSort rowsAnswer providerBrand signal

12of 12 rows

AI Writing & Content Citation Share current rankings
Rank	Entity	Citation share	Mention coverage	Mention share	Citation share	Engine breadth	OpenAI rec. presence	OpenAI coverage	Confidence	N	Change	Trend	Explain
01	Jaspercompany	34.8%	41.67% · 20 / 48	32.79% · 20 / 61	34.78% · 8 / 23	3	62.5% · 5 / 8	43.75% · 7 / 16	100%	23	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
02	HubSpot Content Hubcompany	30.4%	8.33% · 4 / 48	6.56% · 4 / 61	30.43% · 7 / 23	3	0% · 0 / 8	6.25% · 1 / 16	100%	23	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
03	Adobe GenStudiocompany	17.4%	6.25% · 3 / 48	4.92% · 3 / 61	17.39% · 4 / 23	2	0% · 0 / 8	0% · 0 / 16	100%	23	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
04	Typefacecompany	8.7%	12.5% · 6 / 48	9.84% · 6 / 61	8.7% · 2 / 23	3	12.5% · 1 / 8	6.25% · 1 / 16	100%	23	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
05	Rytrcompany	4.3%	4.17% · 2 / 48	3.28% · 2 / 61	4.35% · 1 / 23	2	12.5% · 1 / 8	6.25% · 1 / 16	100%	23	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
06	Writercompany	4.3%	4.17% · 2 / 48	3.28% · 2 / 61	4.35% · 1 / 23	2	12.5% · 1 / 8	6.25% · 1 / 16	100%	23	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
07	Copy.aicompany	0.0%	27.08% · 13 / 48	21.31% · 13 / 61	0% · 0 / 23	3	37.5% · 3 / 8	31.25% · 5 / 16	100%	23	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
08	Writesoniccompany	0.0%	12.5% · 6 / 48	9.84% · 6 / 61	0% · 0 / 23	2	25% · 2 / 8	18.75% · 3 / 16	100%	23	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
09	Grammarlycompany	0.0%	8.33% · 4 / 48	6.56% · 4 / 61	0% · 0 / 23	2	25% · 2 / 8	18.75% · 3 / 16	100%	23	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
10	Canva Magic Writecompany	0.0%	2.08% · 1 / 48	1.64% · 1 / 61	0% · 0 / 23	1	0% · 0 / 8	6.25% · 1 / 16	100%	23	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
11	Anywordcompany	0.0%	0% · 0 / 48	0% · 0 / 61	0% · 0 / 23	0	0% · 0 / 8	0% · 0 / 16	100%	23	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
12	Notion AIcompany	0.0%	0% · 0 / 48	0% · 0 / 61	0% · 0 / 23	0	0% · 0 / 8	0% · 0 / 16	100%	23	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank

AI Writing & Content Citation Share current rankings
Rank	Entity	Citation share	Mention coverage	Mention share	Citation share	Engine breadth	OpenAI rec. presence	OpenAI coverage	Confidence	N	Change	Trend	Explain
01	Jaspercompany	34.8%	41.67% · 20 / 48	32.79% · 20 / 61	34.78% · 8 / 23	3	62.5% · 5 / 8	43.75% · 7 / 16	100%	23	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
02	HubSpot Content Hubcompany	30.4%	8.33% · 4 / 48	6.56% · 4 / 61	30.43% · 7 / 23	3	0% · 0 / 8	6.25% · 1 / 16	100%	23	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
03	Adobe GenStudiocompany	17.4%	6.25% · 3 / 48	4.92% · 3 / 61	17.39% · 4 / 23	2	0% · 0 / 8	0% · 0 / 16	100%	23	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
04	Typefacecompany	8.7%	12.5% · 6 / 48	9.84% · 6 / 61	8.7% · 2 / 23	3	12.5% · 1 / 8	6.25% · 1 / 16	100%	23	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
05	Rytrcompany	4.3%	4.17% · 2 / 48	3.28% · 2 / 61	4.35% · 1 / 23	2	12.5% · 1 / 8	6.25% · 1 / 16	100%	23	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
06	Writercompany	4.3%	4.17% · 2 / 48	3.28% · 2 / 61	4.35% · 1 / 23	2	12.5% · 1 / 8	6.25% · 1 / 16	100%	23	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
07	Copy.aicompany	0.0%	27.08% · 13 / 48	21.31% · 13 / 61	0% · 0 / 23	3	37.5% · 3 / 8	31.25% · 5 / 16	100%	23	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
08	Writesoniccompany	0.0%	12.5% · 6 / 48	9.84% · 6 / 61	0% · 0 / 23	2	25% · 2 / 8	18.75% · 3 / 16	100%	23	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
09	Grammarlycompany	0.0%	8.33% · 4 / 48	6.56% · 4 / 61	0% · 0 / 23	2	25% · 2 / 8	18.75% · 3 / 16	100%	23	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
10	Canva Magic Writecompany	0.0%	2.08% · 1 / 48	1.64% · 1 / 61	0% · 0 / 23	1	0% · 0 / 8	6.25% · 1 / 16	100%	23	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
11	Anywordcompany	0.0%	0% · 0 / 48	0% · 0 / 61	0% · 0 / 23	0	0% · 0 / 8	0% · 0 / 16	100%	23	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
12	Notion AIcompany	0.0%	0% · 0 / 48	0% · 0 / 61	0% · 0 / 23	0	0% · 0 / 8	0% · 0 / 16	100%	23	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank

Primary brandPrompt intentAnswer enginePrompt contains

Run live test

Answer presence41.7%20/48 filtered answers mention or cite Jasper

Selected-set share51.3%Share of answer-presences among the compared brands, not market share

Owned citation answers38 answer-level URL signals on reviewed owned domains

Engine breadth3/3Engines with at least one observed presence

Filtered competitive answer-presence comparison
Brand	Presence	Vs. primary	Selected share	Mentions	Cited answers	Owned URL signals	Engine breadth
Jasperjasper.ai	41.7%20/48	BASE	51.3%	48	3	8	3/3
Copy.aicopy.ai	27.1%13/48	-14.6 pp	33.3%	28	0	0	3/3
Grammarlygrammarly.com	8.3%4/48	-33.3 pp	10.3%	7	0	0	2/3
Writerwriter.com	4.2%2/48	-37.5 pp	5.1%	1	1	1	2/3

ANSWER-LEVEL OBSERVATIONS

Prompt × engine matrix

16 prompts · 48 immutable answer hashes · empty cells mean no compared brand was detected.

Brand presence by public prompt and answer engine
Public prompt	OpenAIopenai/gpt-4o-mini	Anthropicanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5	Geminigoogle/gemini-2.5-flash
01 Which AI content platforms are best for planning, drafting, editing, approving, publishing, and measuring business content?recommendation	JasperGrammarly 6 source URLs`2348b2fc`	Jasper 5 source URLs`dbd0e2be`	Jasper 7 source URLs`5b1d4add`
02 Recommend an enterprise AI content platform that can enforce brand voice, terminology, claims, permissions, approvals, and governance.recommendation	Jasper · C1 4 source URLs`b3867b99`	Writer · C1 6 source URLs`bbb6fd77`	No selected brand 7 source URLs`5edf41c7`
03 Which AI content platforms are strongest for accurate long-form articles, briefs, reports, citations, revision, and human review?recommendation	JasperCopy.aiGrammarly 6 source URLs`426d316f`	JasperCopy.ai 8 source URLs`985186c4`	JasperCopy.ai 8 source URLs`64041807`
04 Recommend an AI content platform for search-focused teams that need research, outlines, optimization, internal links, updates, and quality controls.recommendation	No selected brand 7 source URLs`386db28e`	Jasper 7 source URLs`ed9c4a1b`	No selected brand 5 source URLs`8cd8b5ed`
05 Which AI content platforms are best for producing coordinated campaign assets across web, email, social, ads, sales, and customer communications?recommendation	JasperCopy.ai 7 source URLs`282a31e3`	Jasper · C6Copy.ai 8 source URLs`6a6a2d0a`	JasperCopy.ai 7 source URLs`28ca7c86`
06 Recommend an AI content platform for multilingual localization with terminology, tone, regional review, translation memory, and workflow controls.recommendation	No selected brand 7 source URLs`9dc33997`	No selected brand 4 source URLs`7ef3e9ca`	No selected brand 6 source URLs`80544d9d`
07 Which AI content platforms are strongest for regulated teams that need approved claims, citations, audit history, privacy, and mandatory review?recommendation	Writer 5 source URLs`57a42965`	No selected brand 6 source URLs`fe9533a5`	No selected brand 8 source URLs`5e02f100`
08 Recommend an affordable AI content platform for a small marketing team that needs useful templates, collaboration, fast onboarding, and clear limits.recommendation	JasperCopy.ai 5 source URLs`df3fa7f4`	JasperCopy.ai 5 source URLs`d7c8343f`	Jasper 5 source URLs`50163eaa`
09 Compare AI content platforms on quality, factuality, brand control, workflows, channels, integrations, governance, analytics, and price.commercial	JasperCopy.ai 5 source URLs`e339c712`	JasperCopy.ai 9 source URLs`79af4544`	JasperCopy.ai 7 source URLs`13ff790e`
10 Create a reproducible quality test for AI content platforms covering accuracy, originality, structure, tone, usefulness, editing effort, and citations.commercial	No selected brand 0 source URLs`dea74e27`	Grammarly 8 source URLs`847aa4fe`	No selected brand 3 source URLs`99768477`
11 Design a brand-control evaluation for AI content platforms using style rules, terminology, prohibited claims, examples, audiences, and channels.commercial	No selected brand 0 source URLs`1fab76c5`	No selected brand 0 source URLs`4ebd0ecb`	No selected brand 4 source URLs`4356c76d`
12 Compare AI content platforms on briefs, assignments, collaboration, approvals, versioning, content systems, publishing, and performance feedback.commercial	No selected brand 5 source URLs`c35e677a`	JasperCopy.ai 8 source URLs`a19f39dc`	No selected brand 8 source URLs`16a166e0`
13 Compare AI content platforms on customer-data use, model training, retention, permissions, encryption, residency, audit logs, and deletion.commercial	No selected brand 8 source URLs`6b50d4d2`	No selected brand 9 source URLs`214b9376`	No selected brand 6 source URLs`099834b6`
14 How should a buyer compare AI content platform pricing across seats, words, generations, brand workspaces, channels, integrations, and services?commercial	No selected brand 6 source URLs`b2e1f453`	No selected brand 4 source URLs`e7eade73`	No selected brand 5 source URLs`d75defc5`
15 Which criteria expose brand-model, template, workflow, asset, analytics, integration, export, and API lock-in in an AI content platform?commercial	No selected brand 6 source URLs`d11a9c90`	No selected brand 8 source URLs`ccef7c09`	No selected brand 5 source URLs`68b70e9e`
16 Create a shortlist of AI content platform vendors for a global company standardizing governed marketing and communications production.commercial	JasperCopy.aiGrammarly 5 source URLs`ae0911cd`	No selected brand 8 source URLs`25d95dc0`	Jasper · C1 5 source URLs`3317981b`

STRUCTURED CITATION LEDGER

Sources shaping this filtered view

Hostnames are derived from validated public HTTP(S) URLs, not provider-supplied domain labels.

Validated citation sources in filtered answers
Source hostname	Cited answers	Distinct URLs	Engine breadth	Best position	Evidence
youtube.com	11	10	3	#1	Open source ↗
reddit.com	6	7	3	#2	Open source ↗
slatehq.com	4	6	2	#1	Open source ↗
facebook.com	4	4	2	#2	Open source ↗
sciencedirect.com	4	3	2	#1	Open source ↗
linkedin.com	4	3	3	#2	Open source ↗
getblend.com	4	1	2	#1	Open source ↗
jasper.ai	3	8	3	#1	Open source ↗
blog.hubspot.com	3	4	3	#2	Open source ↗
averi.ai	3	3	1	#1	Open source ↗
glean.com	3	3	1	#5	Open source ↗
stackby.com	3	1	2	#1	Open source ↗
canto.com	3	1	2	#2	Open source ↗
qa.yodo.me	3	1	1	#3	Open source ↗
aprimo.com	2	5	2	#3	Open source ↗
gridly.com	2	4	2	#1	Open source ↗
monday.com	2	3	2	#1	Open source ↗
experienceleague.adobe.com	2	2	1	#1	Open source ↗
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov	2	2	2	#1	Open source ↗
smartling.com	2	2	2	#1	Open source ↗

PUBLIC-BENCHMARK PRIVACY BOUNDARY

This report contains only code-reviewed public prompts, deterministic brand counts, answer hashes, and validated structured citation URLs. Full model answers are neither stored nor published here. No customer, organization, or private tracked-prompt data is included.

ai-writing-content-platforms-2026-07-27 / 4-ai-writing-content-platforms-2026-07-27-models-64232fd32583

AI Writing & Content Citation Share

Current rankings

Brand vs. market

Prompt × engine matrix

Sources shaping this filtered view

Brand vs. market

Prompt × engine matrix

Sources shaping this filtered view