RANK.AI DATA / Latest

AI Meeting Assistants Brands in Anthropic Model API Answers

Ranks reviewed AI Meeting Assistants brands by presence in Anthropic's configured model API answers to the fixed public prompt cohort. This does not measure the consumer application.

Cohort coverage: 12 / 12 · 100%
Evidence: 168 observations
Freshness: current
Export: CSV / JSON

Saved views & sharingPresets, bookmark link, share card, and change feedOpen tools

PUBLIC VIEW / NO LOGINTrack this exact boardFilters and comparisons stay in the URL. Bookmark it, share it, or follow verified snapshot changes.

Follow changes

Watching publication Jul 27, 2026

Leaderboard

Current rankings

Metric: Anthropic recommendation-prompt presence

Find in tableEntity typeMovementConfidenceEvidence NRank rangeColumnsSort rowsAnswer providerBrand signal

12of 12 rows

AI Meeting Assistants Brands in Anthropic Model API Answers current rankings
Rank	Entity	Anthropic recommendation-prompt presence	Mention coverage	Mention share	Citation share	Engine breadth	OpenAI rec. presence	OpenAI coverage	Confidence	N	Change	Trend	Explain
01	Read AIcompany	62.5%	56.25% · 27 / 48	22.69% · 27 / 119	52.73% · 29 / 55	3	75% · 6 / 8	75% · 12 / 16	100%	8	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
02	Otter.aicompany	50.0%	35.42% · 17 / 48	14.29% · 17 / 119	5.45% · 3 / 55	3	50% · 4 / 8	43.75% · 7 / 16	100%	8	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
03	Fathomcompany	37.5%	33.33% · 16 / 48	13.45% · 16 / 119	1.82% · 1 / 55	3	50% · 4 / 8	31.25% · 5 / 16	100%	8	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
04	Fellowcompany	37.5%	27.08% · 13 / 48	10.92% · 13 / 119	0% · 0 / 55	3	12.5% · 1 / 8	12.5% · 2 / 16	100%	8	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
05	Fireflies.aicompany	37.5%	25% · 12 / 48	10.08% · 12 / 119	1.82% · 1 / 55	3	25% · 2 / 8	18.75% · 3 / 16	100%	8	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
06	Avomacompany	25.0%	20.83% · 10 / 48	8.4% · 10 / 119	12.73% · 7 / 55	3	37.5% · 3 / 8	25% · 4 / 16	100%	8	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
07	Krispcompany	0.0%	22.92% · 11 / 48	9.24% · 11 / 119	9.09% · 5 / 55	2	50% · 4 / 8	37.5% · 6 / 16	100%	8	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
08	tl;dvcompany	0.0%	18.75% · 9 / 48	7.56% · 9 / 119	12.73% · 7 / 55	3	25% · 2 / 8	18.75% · 3 / 16	100%	8	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
09	Zoom AI Companioncompany	0.0%	4.17% · 2 / 48	1.68% · 2 / 119	3.64% · 2 / 55	2	12.5% · 1 / 8	6.25% · 1 / 16	100%	8	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
10	Graincompany	0.0%	2.08% · 1 / 48	0.84% · 1 / 119	0% · 0 / 55	1	12.5% · 1 / 8	6.25% · 1 / 16	100%	8	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
11	Sembly AIcompany	0.0%	2.08% · 1 / 48	0.84% · 1 / 119	0% · 0 / 55	1	0% · 0 / 8	0% · 0 / 16	100%	8	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
12	Supernormalcompany	0.0%	0% · 0 / 48	0% · 0 / 119	0% · 0 / 55	0	0% · 0 / 8	0% · 0 / 16	100%	8	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank

AI Meeting Assistants Brands in Anthropic Model API Answers current rankings
Rank	Entity	Anthropic recommendation-prompt presence	Mention coverage	Mention share	Citation share	Engine breadth	OpenAI rec. presence	OpenAI coverage	Confidence	N	Change	Trend	Explain
01	Read AIcompany	62.5%	56.25% · 27 / 48	22.69% · 27 / 119	52.73% · 29 / 55	3	75% · 6 / 8	75% · 12 / 16	100%	8	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
02	Otter.aicompany	50.0%	35.42% · 17 / 48	14.29% · 17 / 119	5.45% · 3 / 55	3	50% · 4 / 8	43.75% · 7 / 16	100%	8	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
03	Fathomcompany	37.5%	33.33% · 16 / 48	13.45% · 16 / 119	1.82% · 1 / 55	3	50% · 4 / 8	31.25% · 5 / 16	100%	8	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
04	Fellowcompany	37.5%	27.08% · 13 / 48	10.92% · 13 / 119	0% · 0 / 55	3	12.5% · 1 / 8	12.5% · 2 / 16	100%	8	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
05	Fireflies.aicompany	37.5%	25% · 12 / 48	10.08% · 12 / 119	1.82% · 1 / 55	3	25% · 2 / 8	18.75% · 3 / 16	100%	8	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
06	Avomacompany	25.0%	20.83% · 10 / 48	8.4% · 10 / 119	12.73% · 7 / 55	3	37.5% · 3 / 8	25% · 4 / 16	100%	8	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
07	Krispcompany	0.0%	22.92% · 11 / 48	9.24% · 11 / 119	9.09% · 5 / 55	2	50% · 4 / 8	37.5% · 6 / 16	100%	8	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
08	tl;dvcompany	0.0%	18.75% · 9 / 48	7.56% · 9 / 119	12.73% · 7 / 55	3	25% · 2 / 8	18.75% · 3 / 16	100%	8	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
09	Zoom AI Companioncompany	0.0%	4.17% · 2 / 48	1.68% · 2 / 119	3.64% · 2 / 55	2	12.5% · 1 / 8	6.25% · 1 / 16	100%	8	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
10	Graincompany	0.0%	2.08% · 1 / 48	0.84% · 1 / 119	0% · 0 / 55	1	12.5% · 1 / 8	6.25% · 1 / 16	100%	8	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
11	Sembly AIcompany	0.0%	2.08% · 1 / 48	0.84% · 1 / 119	0% · 0 / 55	1	0% · 0 / 8	0% · 0 / 16	100%	8	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
12	Supernormalcompany	0.0%	0% · 0 / 48	0% · 0 / 119	0% · 0 / 55	0	0% · 0 / 8	0% · 0 / 16	100%	8	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank

Primary brandPrompt intentAnswer enginePrompt contains

Run live test

Answer presence35.4%17/48 filtered answers mention or cite Otter.ai

Selected-set share30.9%Share of answer-presences among the compared brands, not market share

Owned citation answers33 answer-level URL signals on reviewed owned domains

Engine breadth3/3Engines with at least one observed presence

Filtered competitive answer-presence comparison
Brand	Presence	Vs. primary	Selected share	Mentions	Cited answers	Owned URL signals	Engine breadth
Otter.aiotter.ai	35.4%17/48	BASE	30.9%	51	3	3	3/3
Fathomfathom.video	33.3%16/48	-2.1 pp	29.1%	61	1	1	3/3
Fireflies.aifireflies.ai	25.0%12/48	-10.4 pp	21.8%	39	1	1	3/3
Avomaavoma.com	20.8%10/48	-14.6 pp	18.2%	19	4	7	3/3

ANSWER-LEVEL OBSERVATIONS

Prompt × engine matrix

16 prompts · 48 immutable answer hashes · empty cells mean no compared brand was detected.

Brand presence by public prompt and answer engine
Public prompt	OpenAIopenai/gpt-4o-mini	Anthropicanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5	Geminigoogle/gemini-2.5-flash
01 Which AI meeting assistants are best for accurate transcription, useful summaries, decisions, action items, and searchable meeting memory?recommendation	Otter.aiFireflies.aiFathom 8 source URLs`3d2058f0`	Otter.ai · C1Fathom 7 source URLs`66a51ca2`	FathomAvoma 5 source URLs`6dd06e22`
02 Recommend an AI meeting assistant for a global enterprise that needs administration, retention controls, security, compliance, and data residency.recommendation	Avoma 6 source URLs`7a8dc7cc`	No selected brand 6 source URLs`4c6cfdb4`	No selected brand 8 source URLs`97a9af58`
03 Which AI meeting assistants are strongest for sales calls, coaching, CRM updates, follow-up drafts, deal signals, and account handoffs?recommendation	Avoma 8 source URLs`23b44d70`	FathomAvoma 6 source URLs`4d922f80`	No selected brand 9 source URLs`e82874c3`
04 Recommend an AI meeting assistant for product and engineering teams that need decisions, technical context, tasks, and project-tool integrations.recommendation	FathomAvoma 6 source URLs`43ff0010`	No selected brand 6 source URLs`36c01e81`	No selected brand 8 source URLs`931bf977`
05 Which AI meeting assistants are best for multilingual teams that need high transcription accuracy, speaker identification, translation, and summaries?recommendation	Otter.ai · C1Fireflies.ai 7 source URLs`bacbcadf`	Otter.aiFireflies.ai 8 source URLs`e4a0b21d`	Avoma · C1 6 source URLs`ddb68832`
06 Recommend an AI meeting assistant that can capture calls and in-person conversations with clear consent controls and flexible recording modes.recommendation	Otter.ai 5 source URLs`46a049db`	Otter.aiFireflies.ai 8 source URLs`c71d8028`	Otter.ai · C1 9 source URLs`6b9c47eb`
07 Which AI meeting assistants provide the strongest cited search across past conversations, decisions, topics, people, projects, and follow-up work?recommendation	Otter.aiFathom 6 source URLs`c84d442b`	Otter.aiFireflies.ai · C1Avoma · C4 7 source URLs`846520f7`	Fathom 7 source URLs`ac4f309d`
08 Recommend an affordable AI meeting assistant for a small team that needs fast setup, reliable notes, shared templates, and transparent limits.recommendation	Fathom 8 source URLs`afef9f66`	Fathom · C1 6 source URLs`e1844d8b`	Otter.aiFathom 7 source URLs`73fb2ffb`
09 Compare AI meeting assistants on transcription, summaries, search, actions, integrations, analytics, administration, privacy, and support.commercial	Otter.aiFathom 6 source URLs`bd98ea36`	Otter.aiFireflies.aiFathom 9 source URLs`6ee502bb`	No selected brand 9 source URLs`012b11b8`
10 Create a reproducible evaluation for AI meeting assistants covering word accuracy, speakers, jargon, decisions, action items, and hallucinations.commercial	No selected brand 0 source URLs`6b21df6f`	No selected brand 5 source URLs`0ac413bb`	No selected brand 0 source URLs`599a089b`
11 Compare AI meeting assistants on consent, recording disclosure, encryption, retention, model training, deletion, audit logs, access, and data residency.commercial	Avoma · C1 8 source URLs`cce5a130`	Otter.aiFireflies.aiFathom 8 source URLs`d36156b2`	Avoma · C1 8 source URLs`49a181cb`
12 Compare AI meeting assistants on calendar, conferencing, messaging, CRM, project management, document, automation, API, and webhook integrations.commercial	Otter.aiFireflies.ai 6 source URLs`5e5b114b`	Fireflies.aiFathom 8 source URLs`de93a0f5`	Otter.aiFireflies.ai 5 source URLs`4ddb412a`
13 How should a buyer compare AI meeting assistant pricing across seats, recording hours, storage, uploads, intelligence features, and enterprise controls?commercial	No selected brand 9 source URLs`1a47824b`	No selected brand 9 source URLs`f0c68d55`	No selected brand 7 source URLs`a90b3c68`
14 Design a proof-of-concept scorecard for AI meeting assistants using real calls, difficult audio, domain vocabulary, workflows, and user adoption.commercial	No selected brand 0 source URLs`0c176c4d`	No selected brand 0 source URLs`e89273d8`	No selected brand 0 source URLs`df86e030`
15 Which criteria expose transcript, recording, summary, workspace, integration, export, API, and retention lock-in in an AI meeting assistant?commercial	No selected brand 9 source URLs`947e1ca4`	No selected brand 0 source URLs`1574b3f1`	No selected brand 6 source URLs`282df15c`
16 Create a shortlist of AI meeting assistant vendors for a regulated company replacing manual notes across customer and internal meetings.commercial	Otter.ai 6 source URLs`6ccdaba0`	Otter.aiFireflies.aiFathomAvoma 9 source URLs`0e7228da`	Fireflies.aiFathom 7 source URLs`19f8bd3c`

STRUCTURED CITATION LEDGER

Sources shaping this filtered view

Hostnames are derived from validated public HTTP(S) URLs, not provider-supplied domain labels.

Validated citation sources in filtered answers
Source hostname	Cited answers	Distinct URLs	Engine breadth	Best position	Evidence
read.ai	24	7	3	#1	Open source ↗
zapier.com	24	4	3	#1	Open source ↗
reddit.com	16	12	3	#1	Open source ↗
youtube.com	15	9	3	#1	Open source ↗
fellow.ai	9	8	3	#1	Open source ↗
hinoter.com	9	3	3	#1	Open source ↗
meetingnotes.com	6	4	3	#1	Open source ↗
tldv.io	6	3	3	#1	Open source ↗
faegredrinker.com	6	1	2	#2	Open source ↗
linkedin.com	5	4	3	#2	Open source ↗
krisp.ai	5	3	2	#1	Open source ↗
zackproser.com	5	3	2	#1	Open source ↗
peoplemanagingpeople.com	5	1	2	#2	Open source ↗
avoma.com	4	6	3	#1	Open source ↗
happyscribe.com	4	4	3	#1	Open source ↗
ticnote.com	4	4	3	#1	Open source ↗
huit.harvard.edu	4	1	2	#1	Open source ↗
cirrusinsight.com	4	1	3	#2	Open source ↗
meetily.ai	3	3	2	#1	Open source ↗
mixmax.com	3	3	2	#1	Open source ↗

PUBLIC-BENCHMARK PRIVACY BOUNDARY

This report contains only code-reviewed public prompts, deterministic brand counts, answer hashes, and validated structured citation URLs. Full model answers are neither stored nor published here. No customer, organization, or private tracked-prompt data is included.

ai-meeting-assistants-2026-07-27 / 4-ai-meeting-assistants-2026-07-27-models-64232fd32583

AI Meeting Assistants Brands in Anthropic Model API Answers

Current rankings

Brand vs. market

Prompt × engine matrix

Sources shaping this filtered view

Brand vs. market

Prompt × engine matrix

Sources shaping this filtered view