RANK.AI DATA / Latest

AI Meeting Assistant Rank

Daily visibility of transcription, meeting-memory, workflow, and conversation-intelligence products across a neutral buying corpus.

Cohort coverage: 12 / 12 · 100%
Evidence: 168 observations
Freshness: current
Export: CSV / JSON

Saved views & sharingPresets, bookmark link, share card, and change feedOpen tools

PUBLIC VIEW / NO LOGINTrack this exact boardFilters and comparisons stay in the URL. Bookmark it, share it, or follow verified snapshot changes.

Follow changes

Watching publication Jul 27, 2026

Leaderboard

Current rankings

Metric: Recommendation-prompt presence

Find in tableEntity typeMovementConfidenceEvidence NRank rangeColumnsSort rowsAnswer providerBrand signal

12of 12 rows

AI Meeting Assistant Rank current rankings
Rank	Entity	Recommendation-prompt presence	Mention coverage	Mention share	Citation share	Engine breadth	OpenAI rec. presence	OpenAI coverage	Confidence	N	Change	Trend	Explain
01	Read AIcompany	58.3%	56.25% · 27 / 48	22.69% · 27 / 119	52.73% · 29 / 55	3	75% · 6 / 8	75% · 12 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
02	Otter.aicompany	41.7%	35.42% · 17 / 48	14.29% · 17 / 119	5.45% · 3 / 55	3	50% · 4 / 8	43.75% · 7 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
03	Fathomcompany	41.7%	33.33% · 16 / 48	13.45% · 16 / 119	1.82% · 1 / 55	3	50% · 4 / 8	31.25% · 5 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
04	Fellowcompany	33.3%	27.08% · 13 / 48	10.92% · 13 / 119	0% · 0 / 55	3	12.5% · 1 / 8	12.5% · 2 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
05	Krispcompany	33.3%	22.92% · 11 / 48	9.24% · 11 / 119	9.09% · 5 / 55	2	50% · 4 / 8	37.5% · 6 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
06	Avomacompany	29.2%	20.83% · 10 / 48	8.4% · 10 / 119	12.73% · 7 / 55	3	37.5% · 3 / 8	25% · 4 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
07	Fireflies.aicompany	20.8%	25% · 12 / 48	10.08% · 12 / 119	1.82% · 1 / 55	3	25% · 2 / 8	18.75% · 3 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
08	tl;dvcompany	16.7%	18.75% · 9 / 48	7.56% · 9 / 119	12.73% · 7 / 55	3	25% · 2 / 8	18.75% · 3 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
09	Zoom AI Companioncompany	4.2%	4.17% · 2 / 48	1.68% · 2 / 119	3.64% · 2 / 55	2	12.5% · 1 / 8	6.25% · 1 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
10	Graincompany	4.2%	2.08% · 1 / 48	0.84% · 1 / 119	0% · 0 / 55	1	12.5% · 1 / 8	6.25% · 1 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
11	Sembly AIcompany	4.2%	2.08% · 1 / 48	0.84% · 1 / 119	0% · 0 / 55	1	0% · 0 / 8	0% · 0 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
12	Supernormalcompany	0.0%	0% · 0 / 48	0% · 0 / 119	0% · 0 / 55	0	0% · 0 / 8	0% · 0 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank

AI Meeting Assistant Rank current rankings
Rank	Entity	Recommendation-prompt presence	Mention coverage	Mention share	Citation share	Engine breadth	OpenAI rec. presence	OpenAI coverage	Confidence	N	Change	Trend	Explain
01	Read AIcompany	58.3%	56.25% · 27 / 48	22.69% · 27 / 119	52.73% · 29 / 55	3	75% · 6 / 8	75% · 12 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
02	Otter.aicompany	41.7%	35.42% · 17 / 48	14.29% · 17 / 119	5.45% · 3 / 55	3	50% · 4 / 8	43.75% · 7 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
03	Fathomcompany	41.7%	33.33% · 16 / 48	13.45% · 16 / 119	1.82% · 1 / 55	3	50% · 4 / 8	31.25% · 5 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
04	Fellowcompany	33.3%	27.08% · 13 / 48	10.92% · 13 / 119	0% · 0 / 55	3	12.5% · 1 / 8	12.5% · 2 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
05	Krispcompany	33.3%	22.92% · 11 / 48	9.24% · 11 / 119	9.09% · 5 / 55	2	50% · 4 / 8	37.5% · 6 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
06	Avomacompany	29.2%	20.83% · 10 / 48	8.4% · 10 / 119	12.73% · 7 / 55	3	37.5% · 3 / 8	25% · 4 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
07	Fireflies.aicompany	20.8%	25% · 12 / 48	10.08% · 12 / 119	1.82% · 1 / 55	3	25% · 2 / 8	18.75% · 3 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
08	tl;dvcompany	16.7%	18.75% · 9 / 48	7.56% · 9 / 119	12.73% · 7 / 55	3	25% · 2 / 8	18.75% · 3 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
09	Zoom AI Companioncompany	4.2%	4.17% · 2 / 48	1.68% · 2 / 119	3.64% · 2 / 55	2	12.5% · 1 / 8	6.25% · 1 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
10	Graincompany	4.2%	2.08% · 1 / 48	0.84% · 1 / 119	0% · 0 / 55	1	12.5% · 1 / 8	6.25% · 1 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
11	Sembly AIcompany	4.2%	2.08% · 1 / 48	0.84% · 1 / 119	0% · 0 / 55	1	0% · 0 / 8	0% · 0 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank
12	Supernormalcompany	0.0%	0% · 0 / 48	0% · 0 / 119	0% · 0 / 55	0	0% · 0 / 8	0% · 0 / 16	100%	24	—	—	Analyze brand Why this rank

Primary brandPrompt intentAnswer enginePrompt contains

Run live test

Answer presence35.4%17/48 filtered answers mention or cite Otter.ai

Selected-set share30.9%Share of answer-presences among the compared brands, not market share

Owned citation answers33 answer-level URL signals on reviewed owned domains

Engine breadth3/3Engines with at least one observed presence

Filtered competitive answer-presence comparison
Brand	Presence	Vs. primary	Selected share	Mentions	Cited answers	Owned URL signals	Engine breadth
Otter.aiotter.ai	35.4%17/48	BASE	30.9%	51	3	3	3/3
Fathomfathom.video	33.3%16/48	-2.1 pp	29.1%	61	1	1	3/3
Fireflies.aifireflies.ai	25.0%12/48	-10.4 pp	21.8%	39	1	1	3/3
Avomaavoma.com	20.8%10/48	-14.6 pp	18.2%	19	4	7	3/3

ANSWER-LEVEL OBSERVATIONS

Prompt × engine matrix

16 prompts · 48 immutable answer hashes · empty cells mean no compared brand was detected.

Brand presence by public prompt and answer engine
Public prompt	OpenAIopenai/gpt-4o-mini	Anthropicanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5	Geminigoogle/gemini-2.5-flash
01 Which AI meeting assistants are best for accurate transcription, useful summaries, decisions, action items, and searchable meeting memory?recommendation	Otter.aiFireflies.aiFathom 8 source URLs`3d2058f0`	Otter.ai · C1Fathom 7 source URLs`66a51ca2`	FathomAvoma 5 source URLs`6dd06e22`
02 Recommend an AI meeting assistant for a global enterprise that needs administration, retention controls, security, compliance, and data residency.recommendation	Avoma 6 source URLs`7a8dc7cc`	No selected brand 6 source URLs`4c6cfdb4`	No selected brand 8 source URLs`97a9af58`
03 Which AI meeting assistants are strongest for sales calls, coaching, CRM updates, follow-up drafts, deal signals, and account handoffs?recommendation	Avoma 8 source URLs`23b44d70`	FathomAvoma 6 source URLs`4d922f80`	No selected brand 9 source URLs`e82874c3`
04 Recommend an AI meeting assistant for product and engineering teams that need decisions, technical context, tasks, and project-tool integrations.recommendation	FathomAvoma 6 source URLs`43ff0010`	No selected brand 6 source URLs`36c01e81`	No selected brand 8 source URLs`931bf977`
05 Which AI meeting assistants are best for multilingual teams that need high transcription accuracy, speaker identification, translation, and summaries?recommendation	Otter.ai · C1Fireflies.ai 7 source URLs`bacbcadf`	Otter.aiFireflies.ai 8 source URLs`e4a0b21d`	Avoma · C1 6 source URLs`ddb68832`
06 Recommend an AI meeting assistant that can capture calls and in-person conversations with clear consent controls and flexible recording modes.recommendation	Otter.ai 5 source URLs`46a049db`	Otter.aiFireflies.ai 8 source URLs`c71d8028`	Otter.ai · C1 9 source URLs`6b9c47eb`
07 Which AI meeting assistants provide the strongest cited search across past conversations, decisions, topics, people, projects, and follow-up work?recommendation	Otter.aiFathom 6 source URLs`c84d442b`	Otter.aiFireflies.ai · C1Avoma · C4 7 source URLs`846520f7`	Fathom 7 source URLs`ac4f309d`
08 Recommend an affordable AI meeting assistant for a small team that needs fast setup, reliable notes, shared templates, and transparent limits.recommendation	Fathom 8 source URLs`afef9f66`	Fathom · C1 6 source URLs`e1844d8b`	Otter.aiFathom 7 source URLs`73fb2ffb`
09 Compare AI meeting assistants on transcription, summaries, search, actions, integrations, analytics, administration, privacy, and support.commercial	Otter.aiFathom 6 source URLs`bd98ea36`	Otter.aiFireflies.aiFathom 9 source URLs`6ee502bb`	No selected brand 9 source URLs`012b11b8`
10 Create a reproducible evaluation for AI meeting assistants covering word accuracy, speakers, jargon, decisions, action items, and hallucinations.commercial	No selected brand 0 source URLs`6b21df6f`	No selected brand 5 source URLs`0ac413bb`	No selected brand 0 source URLs`599a089b`
11 Compare AI meeting assistants on consent, recording disclosure, encryption, retention, model training, deletion, audit logs, access, and data residency.commercial	Avoma · C1 8 source URLs`cce5a130`	Otter.aiFireflies.aiFathom 8 source URLs`d36156b2`	Avoma · C1 8 source URLs`49a181cb`
12 Compare AI meeting assistants on calendar, conferencing, messaging, CRM, project management, document, automation, API, and webhook integrations.commercial	Otter.aiFireflies.ai 6 source URLs`5e5b114b`	Fireflies.aiFathom 8 source URLs`de93a0f5`	Otter.aiFireflies.ai 5 source URLs`4ddb412a`
13 How should a buyer compare AI meeting assistant pricing across seats, recording hours, storage, uploads, intelligence features, and enterprise controls?commercial	No selected brand 9 source URLs`1a47824b`	No selected brand 9 source URLs`f0c68d55`	No selected brand 7 source URLs`a90b3c68`
14 Design a proof-of-concept scorecard for AI meeting assistants using real calls, difficult audio, domain vocabulary, workflows, and user adoption.commercial	No selected brand 0 source URLs`0c176c4d`	No selected brand 0 source URLs`e89273d8`	No selected brand 0 source URLs`df86e030`
15 Which criteria expose transcript, recording, summary, workspace, integration, export, API, and retention lock-in in an AI meeting assistant?commercial	No selected brand 9 source URLs`947e1ca4`	No selected brand 0 source URLs`1574b3f1`	No selected brand 6 source URLs`282df15c`
16 Create a shortlist of AI meeting assistant vendors for a regulated company replacing manual notes across customer and internal meetings.commercial	Otter.ai 6 source URLs`6ccdaba0`	Otter.aiFireflies.aiFathomAvoma 9 source URLs`0e7228da`	Fireflies.aiFathom 7 source URLs`19f8bd3c`

STRUCTURED CITATION LEDGER

Sources shaping this filtered view

Hostnames are derived from validated public HTTP(S) URLs, not provider-supplied domain labels.

Validated citation sources in filtered answers
Source hostname	Cited answers	Distinct URLs	Engine breadth	Best position	Evidence
read.ai	24	7	3	#1	Open source ↗
zapier.com	24	4	3	#1	Open source ↗
reddit.com	16	12	3	#1	Open source ↗
youtube.com	15	9	3	#1	Open source ↗
fellow.ai	9	8	3	#1	Open source ↗
hinoter.com	9	3	3	#1	Open source ↗
meetingnotes.com	6	4	3	#1	Open source ↗
tldv.io	6	3	3	#1	Open source ↗
faegredrinker.com	6	1	2	#2	Open source ↗
linkedin.com	5	4	3	#2	Open source ↗
krisp.ai	5	3	2	#1	Open source ↗
zackproser.com	5	3	2	#1	Open source ↗
peoplemanagingpeople.com	5	1	2	#2	Open source ↗
avoma.com	4	6	3	#1	Open source ↗
happyscribe.com	4	4	3	#1	Open source ↗
ticnote.com	4	4	3	#1	Open source ↗
huit.harvard.edu	4	1	2	#1	Open source ↗
cirrusinsight.com	4	1	3	#2	Open source ↗
meetily.ai	3	3	2	#1	Open source ↗
mixmax.com	3	3	2	#1	Open source ↗

PUBLIC-BENCHMARK PRIVACY BOUNDARY

This report contains only code-reviewed public prompts, deterministic brand counts, answer hashes, and validated structured citation URLs. Full model answers are neither stored nor published here. No customer, organization, or private tracked-prompt data is included.

ai-meeting-assistants-2026-07-27 / 4-ai-meeting-assistants-2026-07-27-models-64232fd32583

AI Meeting Assistant Rank

Current rankings

Brand vs. market

Prompt × engine matrix

Sources shaping this filtered view

Brand vs. market

Prompt × engine matrix

Sources shaping this filtered view